How many times have you heard or read this phrase: “Silence equals consent“?
I’ve heard it said by many speakers & writers in the so-called “truth movement“. I read recently where it was called a “legal maxim“, and that it was authored by Plato, but is also attributed to Sir Thomas Moore in the form of the phrase, “Silence gives consent“. The phrase, “silence equals consent” (and variations of this) is the way of the elitist pigs, who run the world, to cheat their own game, which is rigged, by the way.
I mean, we already know the powerful are corrupt and lie to the masses, so why believe a maxim that comes from elitist rulers who have filtered this phrase into the truth movement via their own infiltrators?
What is normally regarded “consent” cannot be considered consent if: it is forced, coerced, manufactured, mind controlled, silent, inferred, manipulated, uninformed, or misled. I reserve the right to add more to that list as I see fit.
All links provided within this article provide various proofs to the concepts about which I speak, so I ask you to please take a look at them.
It can only be considered consent if the party consenting knows exactly what all the ramifications are related to that consent. If consent is uninformed, than the supposed consenter does not truly know what they are consenting to. So I would ask, how can someone agree to something they do not understand? The very idea is ludicrous.
People talk about “waking up“… so what is “asleep“? It is when you are so mind controlled you cannot see what the system is doing right in front of your face, you are asleep or unconscious to what is really going on. You cannot “see the forest for the trees”, so to speak. If you are not truly conscious of what is happening, then how can you really give consent? Uninformed consent is not consent.
If you are aware of what is going on, but feel helpless to fight the system because you have been: threatened, manipulated, tortured, deprived, or lost your livelihood, then how is there any consent? You have been coerced. Coerced consent is not consent.
Why are people so unconscious? Well, first off, most people are prepped with trauma of some sort, at birth (examples include circumcision, separation from mother, abuse, etc.), or shortly thereafter. Then, they are hypnotized by the flicker rate of TV (which was my babysitter when I was growing up), and then given post hypnotic suggestion via advertisements, or even every day phrases like “silence equals consent” or “justice is blind”, as a couple of examples.
That maxim, so often quoted by others, is a lie because silence does not necessarily equal consent. In fact, the maxim of “silence equals consent” is not even accepted in modern English law, yet the phrase is so often repeated that many people believe this. More often, silence equals fear to speak out, or an unconsciousness of the motive and the consequence. At this rate, given the various methods of mind control in existence today, it seems that all consent to be ruled or governed, & to have rights & freedoms taken away, is now manufactured through coercion. Manufactured consent is not consent.
By the way, “inalienable“, as in “inalienable rights“, means they cannot be taken away or given away or transferred from one person to another.
Whether silence equals consent is immaterial since mind control clearly does not equal consent. Regardless of what form it takes, mind control clearly equals removal of freewill. And, without freewill, how can someone give consent?
It’s kind of like the phrase/meme I love to mention, “justice is blind”. They SAY it means that justice is impartial, but that is the lie…. & the system DOES lie to & manipulate the people. The phrase “justice is blind” is like a spell… to make it so justice does not see… so that people do not get true justice. My theory here is that people, nonchalantly repeating that phrase, collectively cause that state of “blind justice”, justice which cannot see, into being, thereby making it so that those who are the real criminals do not get punished and those who are the real victims of all this control end up being persecuted. I doubt anyone consented to that except for those who would profit from it. Rather, they were mind controlled to repeat it and believe it means that justice is impartial.
This is similar to the case with the phrase, “silence is consent”, or “silence gives consent”. It is just another phrase that the people are encouraged to repeat in order to make the victims of a wicked system feel guilty or somehow responsible for what is being done, clearly, without their consent.
Even more so, it is like a woman who gave consent to have sex after she had been drugged with ruffies. Was her consent legally obtained? No, because that consent was manufactured by the drug.
The manipulation we see in the physical world today is the result of control that has been happening for millennia on levels most people are not privy to & deny its existence because to examine it would cause too much cognitive dissonance for them, which is why it works for those with power so well. However, it is also the reason why silence is not consent.
Most of the time, consent is SO manufactured that it clearly is no longer consent. As mentioned above, the flicker rate of television & movies has a tendency to put people in a semi-hypnotized state. If TV was your babysitter, then you may have spent most of your life in this state, in which case, you may have been the victim of post hypnotic suggestion on a regular basis, unbeknownst to you. Then you have to consider that many people fall asleep with the TV on. I used to do it myself. Looking back, I wonder how much garbage went into my psyche, or how much it affected my life & potential???
Did I consent to have TV as a baby sitter? I don’t think so. Did that new born baby boy consent to genital mutilation as a newborn? Nope. Does TV programming contain hidden subliminal messages in the design? I feel that has been established by those who have examined various movies & television shows for these hidden messages. Do these hidden messages directly access the subconscious mind when a person has been entranced by the flicker-rate? It seems obvious to me. It is trauma-based mind control. Trauma is often done at birth, repeated at various stages throughout one’s life, and is combined with flicker-rate trances & post-hypnotic suggestion. It’s a formula.
Mind Control exists in multiple forms, as I have shown in this article and others.
Consent is manufactured using mind control.
Mind control, by definition, removes freewill.
Therefore consent for the current systems of slavery, whether they involve debt, government welfare, nonconsensual human experimentation, or any other form of slavery, is never legally obtained by the enslaver, no matter what they try to make us believe. Mind control removes freewill. If you don’t have freewill, than it is not you who consented.
I was inspired to write this after seeing so many people involved in the truth movement use that phrase, “silence equals consent“, & after seeing so many people in the new age movement talking about how “life is what you make it“. If you’ve been mind controlled, then your life is not what you made it. It is what someone else has decided to make it, often, long before you were even born, and how could anyone legally give consent to that?
April 13, 2014 | Categories: Mind Control, Occult, Psychology | Tags: coerced consent, coercion, cognitive dissonance, consent, flicker rate, flicker-rate hypnoisis, formula, freewill, hidden messages, inalienable, inalienable rights, justice is blind, legal maxim, manufacturing consent, mind control, new age movement, post-hypnotic suggestion, programming, psyche, silence equals consent, silence gives consent, silence is not consent, slavery, sorcery, spell, subliminal messages, television programming, trauma, trauma based mind control, truth movement | 5 Comments