How many times have you heard or read this phrase: “Silence equals consent“?
I’ve heard it said by many speakers & writers in the so-called “truth movement“. I read recently where it was called a “legal maxim“, and that it was authored by Plato, but is also attributed to Sir Thomas Moore in the form of the phrase, “Silence gives consent“. The phrase, “silence equals consent” (and variations of this) is the way of the elitist pigs, who run the world, to cheat their own game, which is rigged, by the way.
I mean, we already know the powerful are corrupt and lie to the masses, so why believe a maxim that comes from elitist rulers who have filtered this phrase into the truth movement via their own infiltrators?
What is normally regarded “consent” cannot be considered consent if: it is forced, coerced, manufactured, mind controlled, silent, inferred, manipulated, uninformed, or misled. I reserve the right to add more to that list as I see fit.
All links provided within this article provide various proofs to the concepts about which I speak, so I ask you to please take a look at them.
It can only be considered consent if the party consenting knows exactly what all the ramifications are related to that consent. If consent is uninformed, than the supposed consenter does not truly know what they are consenting to. So I would ask, how can someone agree to something they do not understand? The very idea is ludicrous.
People talk about “waking up“… so what is “asleep“? It is when you are so mind controlled you cannot see what the system is doing right in front of your face, you are asleep or unconscious to what is really going on. You cannot “see the forest for the trees”, so to speak. If you are not truly conscious of what is happening, then how can you really give consent? Uninformed consent is not consent.
If you are aware of what is going on, but feel helpless to fight the system because you have been: threatened, manipulated, tortured, deprived, or lost your livelihood, then how is there any consent? You have been coerced. Coerced consent is not consent.
Why are people so unconscious? Well, first off, most people are prepped with trauma of some sort, at birth (examples include circumcision, separation from mother, abuse, etc.), or shortly thereafter. Then, they are hypnotized by the flicker rate of TV (which was my babysitter when I was growing up), and then given post hypnotic suggestion via advertisements, or even every day phrases like “silence equals consent” or “justice is blind”, as a couple of examples.
That maxim, so often quoted by others, is a lie because silence does not necessarily equal consent. In fact, the maxim of “silence equals consent” is not even accepted in modern English law, yet the phrase is so often repeated that many people believe this. More often, silence equals fear to speak out, or an unconsciousness of the motive and the consequence. At this rate, given the various methods of mind control in existence today, it seems that all consent to be ruled or governed, & to have rights & freedoms taken away, is now manufactured through coercion. Manufactured consent is not consent.
By the way, “inalienable“, as in “inalienable rights“, means they cannot be taken away or given away or transferred from one person to another.
Whether silence equals consent is immaterial since mind control clearly does not equal consent. Regardless of what form it takes, mind control clearly equals removal of freewill. And, without freewill, how can someone give consent?
It’s kind of like the phrase/meme I love to mention, “justice is blind”. They SAY it means that justice is impartial, but that is the lie…. & the system DOES lie to & manipulate the people. The phrase “justice is blind” is like a spell… to make it so justice does not see… so that people do not get true justice. My theory here is that people, nonchalantly repeating that phrase, collectively cause that state of “blind justice”, justice which cannot see, into being, thereby making it so that those who are the real criminals do not get punished and those who are the real victims of all this control end up being persecuted. I doubt anyone consented to that except for those who would profit from it. Rather, they were mind controlled to repeat it and believe it means that justice is impartial.
This is similar to the case with the phrase, “silence is consent”, or “silence gives consent”. It is just another phrase that the people are encouraged to repeat in order to make the victims of a wicked system feel guilty or somehow responsible for what is being done, clearly, without their consent.
Even more so, it is like a woman who gave consent to have sex after she had been drugged with ruffies. Was her consent legally obtained? No, because that consent was manufactured by the drug.
The manipulation we see in the physical world today is the result of control that has been happening for millennia on levels most people are not privy to & deny its existence because to examine it would cause too much cognitive dissonance for them, which is why it works for those with power so well. However, it is also the reason why silence is not consent.
Most of the time, consent is SO manufactured that it clearly is no longer consent. As mentioned above, the flicker rate of television & movies has a tendency to put people in a semi-hypnotized state. If TV was your babysitter, then you may have spent most of your life in this state, in which case, you may have been the victim of post hypnotic suggestion on a regular basis, unbeknownst to you. Then you have to consider that many people fall asleep with the TV on. I used to do it myself. Looking back, I wonder how much garbage went into my psyche, or how much it affected my life & potential???
Did I consent to have TV as a baby sitter? I don’t think so. Did that new born baby boy consent to genital mutilation as a newborn? Nope. Does TV programming contain hidden subliminal messages in the design? I feel that has been established by those who have examined various movies & television shows for these hidden messages. Do these hidden messages directly access the subconscious mind when a person has been entranced by the flicker-rate? It seems obvious to me. It is trauma-based mind control. Trauma is often done at birth, repeated at various stages throughout one’s life, and is combined with flicker-rate trances & post-hypnotic suggestion. It’s a formula.
Mind Control exists in multiple forms, as I have shown in this article and others.
Consent is manufactured using mind control.
Mind control, by definition, removes freewill.
Therefore consent for the current systems of slavery, whether they involve debt, government welfare, nonconsensual human experimentation, or any other form of slavery, is never legally obtained by the enslaver, no matter what they try to make us believe. Mind control removes freewill. If you don’t have freewill, than it is not you who consented.
I was inspired to write this after seeing so many people involved in the truth movement use that phrase, “silence equals consent“, & after seeing so many people in the new age movement talking about how “life is what you make it“. If you’ve been mind controlled, then your life is not what you made it. It is what someone else has decided to make it, often, long before you were even born, and how could anyone legally give consent to that?
April 13, 2014 | Categories: Mind Control, Occult, Psychology | Tags: coerced consent, coercion, cognitive dissonance, consent, flicker rate, flicker-rate hypnoisis, formula, freewill, hidden messages, inalienable, inalienable rights, justice is blind, legal maxim, manufacturing consent, mind control, new age movement, post-hypnotic suggestion, programming, psyche, silence equals consent, silence gives consent, silence is not consent, slavery, sorcery, spell, subliminal messages, television programming, trauma, trauma based mind control, truth movement | 5 Comments
How Do “they” Get Away With It?
So if you are paying attention, you may be wondering how things got so out of hand, & away from the interest of the general population.
If you ever wonder how big corporations & wealthy, elitist families have been able to amass so much power & get away with so many crimes (often swept under the rug, hidden from the masses), you might consider the law of attraction & the archetype of “Lady Justice“. Although, after what I have seen, it would be more accurate to call this an “arche-typo“, because it certainly seems to be in error. Sadly, I know it was anything but an accident that justice has indeed been made blind. It has become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I have covered the “Justice is Blind” meme in multiple documents online, as well as in some videos. I am writing about this in yet another article because it is the biggest example that shows proof for what I call “archetypal transference“, which has been used to manipulate reality, to the benefit of the powerful & wealthy, & to the detriment of the mind-controlled masses.
ar·che·type (from dictionary.reference.com)
1. the original pattern or model from which all things of the same kind are copied or on which they are based; a model or first form; prototype.
2. (in Jungian psychology) a collectively inherited unconscious idea, pattern of thought, image, etc., universally present in individual psyches.
transference (from freedictionary.com)
[ˈtrænsfərəns -frəns] n
1. the act or an instance of transferring or the state of being transferred.
2. (Psychoanalysis) Psychoanal the redirection of attitudes and emotions towards a substitute, such as towards the analyst during therapy.
How many times have you heard the phrase “Justice is Blind” repeated in your life? You might assume it means that justice is fair & impartial, but is that really what it means? Have you ever noticed what the archetypal image of “Lady Justice” looks like? She is most commonly shown blindfolded, holding scales & a sword. This means that the archetype of justice cares not about the way people are mind controlled into doing or becoming things that are looked down upon, as long as the scales are balanced.
So the corporation that poisons the majority of the population of one country is “A-Okay” in her book, as long as they provide housing or healthcare for the starving peoples of another country.
Oh, wait… that’s right… she’s blind! No wonder!
Case in point:
Tobacco companies make their products more addictive than natural tobacco is, in order to make people continue to purchase their product, & have no consideration of the effects of these products on their market. No matter how you feel about smokers or ex-smokers trying to sue the big tobacco companies, some of you may remember a time when doctors were telling their patients that smoking was healthy & led to a longer life.
“Companies like Phillip Morris and RJ Reynolds participated in medical conventions by sponsoring doctors’ lounges and giving away free cigarettes. But the most inventive method to influence physicians was RJ Reynolds’s creation of its Medical Relations Division.”
Several years ago, there were major, class action lawsuits aganst certain tobacco companies. In some cases, these lawsuits were won by the claimants because it was proven that the companies knowingly caused their product to be more addictive than natural tobacco is. So, now these families are awaiting the money, from the tobacco companies, awarded to them by the courts. It is taking them years to pay these claimants, & in the meanwhile, the victims are slowly dying off. It is probably similar in most class-action lawsuits against powerful corporations.
How were companies able to get away with this stuff then? How do companies pushing genetically modified foods & hormonally tampered with farm animals get away with it now?
Check that “Justice is Blind” archetype, & consider how often the idea & phrase are repeated by people in the general population. I contend it is one of the biggest reasons why big companies have been able to get away with so many injustices in this world.
Also, please consider the fact that this phrase has been around Since about the 15th century. This means that the phrase has been repeated by an ignorant public for what – 5 centuries now? If you are familiar with Law of Attraction, then you understand the ramifications of so many people repeating such a phrase for so many years. So, just what have we unwittingly attracted to ourselves?
So, if this archetype has been successfully used in society at large, to create this state where justice is indeed blind, imagine what all of the other archetypes in our world have contributed to? Think about astrology or the tarot: these are two sets of archetypes that have become very popular over the centuries. Then, these archetypes are manipulated in advertising, music, and movies, in very subtle ways that reach the subconscious mind, causing the average person to behave in relation to them. These archetypes are what I would call “graven images“.
Image credit for the cigarette ads goes to: http://www.healio.com/hematology-oncology/news/print/hematology-oncology/%7B241d62a7-fe6e-4c5b-9fed-a33cc6e4bd7c%7D/cigarettes-were-once-physician-tested-approved
https://metaphysicalforensics.wordpress.com/2014/03/16/as-above-so-below-are-we-programmed-by-archetypes/ (for more examples of archetypal transference)
musicis2words ©2014 All rights reserved
Copyright Disclaimer: Images used under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”
March 21, 2014 | Categories: Mind Control, Occult, Psychology, Symbolism | Tags: achetype, arche-typo, archetypal transference, as above so below, graven images, justice is blind, lady justice, law of attraction, meme, metaphysical forensics, mind control, psyche, psychology, self-fulfilling prophecy, transference | 4 Comments
Why Is Justice Blind?
If you were completely foreign to the meme, “justice is blind“, how would you view that statement or its associated archetype? Would you not find the idea of justice that cannot see as strange?
While I have covered this particular meme in other documents about Archetypal Transference, I wanted to address it specifically in a document that is shorter & therefore easier to read.
The phrase “justice is blind“, is said to mean that justice is impartial, or that it is not biased, but I strongly disagree. The latter phrase is only two more syllables than the former. Is it really that much harder to say “justice is impartial”? How about “justice is fair“? Wouldn’t that last phrase be more accurate if one was trying to imply hat justice was “impartial”?
I believe the phrase “justice is blind” is a type of spell. It has become a sort of self-replicating meme, repeated by people who believe it means something other than what seems to be the actual intent behind such a phrase. The more people repeat it, the more the situation has become so. This is readily evident in the world today, if you’ve been paying attention.
If you are a victim of someone else’s misdeeds & find it difficult to get justice for your cause, you may understand this.
If you recognize the structure of western society, whereby corporations continue to rip of consumers by not only removing jobs from the country that spends the most money on their products, but by also ripping off their new employees in foreign countries by paying them less than a decent or living wage for their labor, & then rips off the consumer by skimping on their labor & raw materials, thus creating a substandard product, then you may recognize how justice has been anything but fair lately.
If you understand that the creation of the fed has helped to put the USA in ruin, then you may see the larger truth of what I am saying.
If you see how a relatively small portion of the population is wrongfully profiting from other people’s suffering, then you are seeing an effect of Archetypal Transference related to the whole “justice is blind” concept….
You may see the actual ramifications of getting people to repeat the phrase, “justice is blind”, over & over again over a period of many years, since around the 15th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Justice).
If you do an internet search for the phrase, “justice is blind“, you may find more than one definition of it, many of which continue to point to the idea that it means that justice is impartial. This is a fallacy, designed to snow you, the public, into bringing about the condition of your own slavery, using what is referred to as “the law of attraction”.
The familiar icon, of the blindfolded woman holding the so-called scales of justice & a sword, is an archetype…. or is it an “archetypo“? Why would anyone want justice to be blind? Can she see how those scales are (in reality) way of balance? Apparently not.
To answer the question of the why, one must understand who profits & benefits the most from this forced manipulation of reality. Discover who controls most of the world’s wealth, & you will see who is behind this spell of a meme that began centuries ago, & has created a real dystopia for those who are the victims of this unfair & biased system of things.
I honestly feel that it is time to take the blindfold off of “Lady Justice” so that she may finally be able to do her job correctly. Justice should be fair, not blind.
2014©musicis2words All rights reserved
March 12, 2014 | Categories: Matirx, Occult, Symbolism, Uncategorized | Tags: archetypal transference, archetype, justice, justice is blind, lady justice, law of attraction, meme, metaphysical forensics, metaphysics, occult, self-fulfilling prophecy, spell | 3 Comments