How many times have you heard or read this phrase: “Silence equals consent“?
I’ve heard it said by many speakers & writers in the so-called “truth movement“. I read recently where it was called a “legal maxim“, and that it was authored by Plato, but is also attributed to Sir Thomas Moore in the form of the phrase, “Silence gives consent“. The phrase, “silence equals consent” (and variations of this) is the way of the elitist pigs, who run the world, to cheat their own game, which is rigged, by the way.
I mean, we already know the powerful are corrupt and lie to the masses, so why believe a maxim that comes from elitist rulers who have filtered this phrase into the truth movement via their own infiltrators?
What is normally regarded “consent” cannot be considered consent if: it is forced, coerced, manufactured, mind controlled, silent, inferred, manipulated, uninformed, or misled. I reserve the right to add more to that list as I see fit.
All links provided within this article provide various proofs to the concepts about which I speak, so I ask you to please take a look at them.
It can only be considered consent if the party consenting knows exactly what all the ramifications are related to that consent. If consent is uninformed, than the supposed consenter does not truly know what they are consenting to. So I would ask, how can someone agree to something they do not understand? The very idea is ludicrous.
People talk about “waking up“… so what is “asleep“? It is when you are so mind controlled you cannot see what the system is doing right in front of your face, you are asleep or unconscious to what is really going on. You cannot “see the forest for the trees”, so to speak. If you are not truly conscious of what is happening, then how can you really give consent? Uninformed consent is not consent.
If you are aware of what is going on, but feel helpless to fight the system because you have been: threatened, manipulated, tortured, deprived, or lost your livelihood, then how is there any consent? You have been coerced. Coerced consent is not consent.
Why are people so unconscious? Well, first off, most people are prepped with trauma of some sort, at birth (examples include circumcision, separation from mother, abuse, etc.), or shortly thereafter. Then, they are hypnotized by the flicker rate of TV (which was my babysitter when I was growing up), and then given post hypnotic suggestion via advertisements, or even every day phrases like “silence equals consent” or “justice is blind”, as a couple of examples.
That maxim, so often quoted by others, is a lie because silence does not necessarily equal consent. In fact, the maxim of “silence equals consent” is not even accepted in modern English law, yet the phrase is so often repeated that many people believe this. More often, silence equals fear to speak out, or an unconsciousness of the motive and the consequence. At this rate, given the various methods of mind control in existence today, it seems that all consent to be ruled or governed, & to have rights & freedoms taken away, is now manufactured through coercion. Manufactured consent is not consent.
By the way, “inalienable“, as in “inalienable rights“, means they cannot be taken away or given away or transferred from one person to another.
Whether silence equals consent is immaterial since mind control clearly does not equal consent. Regardless of what form it takes, mind control clearly equals removal of freewill. And, without freewill, how can someone give consent?
It’s kind of like the phrase/meme I love to mention, “justice is blind”. They SAY it means that justice is impartial, but that is the lie…. & the system DOES lie to & manipulate the people. The phrase “justice is blind” is like a spell… to make it so justice does not see… so that people do not get true justice. My theory here is that people, nonchalantly repeating that phrase, collectively cause that state of “blind justice”, justice which cannot see, into being, thereby making it so that those who are the real criminals do not get punished and those who are the real victims of all this control end up being persecuted. I doubt anyone consented to that except for those who would profit from it. Rather, they were mind controlled to repeat it and believe it means that justice is impartial.
This is similar to the case with the phrase, “silence is consent”, or “silence gives consent”. It is just another phrase that the people are encouraged to repeat in order to make the victims of a wicked system feel guilty or somehow responsible for what is being done, clearly, without their consent.
Even more so, it is like a woman who gave consent to have sex after she had been drugged with ruffies. Was her consent legally obtained? No, because that consent was manufactured by the drug.
The manipulation we see in the physical world today is the result of control that has been happening for millennia on levels most people are not privy to & deny its existence because to examine it would cause too much cognitive dissonance for them, which is why it works for those with power so well. However, it is also the reason why silence is not consent.
Most of the time, consent is SO manufactured that it clearly is no longer consent. As mentioned above, the flicker rate of television & movies has a tendency to put people in a semi-hypnotized state. If TV was your babysitter, then you may have spent most of your life in this state, in which case, you may have been the victim of post hypnotic suggestion on a regular basis, unbeknownst to you. Then you have to consider that many people fall asleep with the TV on. I used to do it myself. Looking back, I wonder how much garbage went into my psyche, or how much it affected my life & potential???
Did I consent to have TV as a baby sitter? I don’t think so. Did that new born baby boy consent to genital mutilation as a newborn? Nope. Does TV programming contain hidden subliminal messages in the design? I feel that has been established by those who have examined various movies & television shows for these hidden messages. Do these hidden messages directly access the subconscious mind when a person has been entranced by the flicker-rate? It seems obvious to me. It is trauma-based mind control. Trauma is often done at birth, repeated at various stages throughout one’s life, and is combined with flicker-rate trances & post-hypnotic suggestion. It’s a formula.
Mind Control exists in multiple forms, as I have shown in this article and others.
Consent is manufactured using mind control.
Mind control, by definition, removes freewill.
Therefore consent for the current systems of slavery, whether they involve debt, government welfare, nonconsensual human experimentation, or any other form of slavery, is never legally obtained by the enslaver, no matter what they try to make us believe. Mind control removes freewill. If you don’t have freewill, than it is not you who consented.
I was inspired to write this after seeing so many people involved in the truth movement use that phrase, “silence equals consent“, & after seeing so many people in the new age movement talking about how “life is what you make it“. If you’ve been mind controlled, then your life is not what you made it. It is what someone else has decided to make it, often, long before you were even born, and how could anyone legally give consent to that?
April 13, 2014 | Categories: Mind Control, Occult, Psychology | Tags: coerced consent, coercion, cognitive dissonance, consent, flicker rate, flicker-rate hypnoisis, formula, freewill, hidden messages, inalienable, inalienable rights, justice is blind, legal maxim, manufacturing consent, mind control, new age movement, post-hypnotic suggestion, programming, psyche, silence equals consent, silence gives consent, silence is not consent, slavery, sorcery, spell, subliminal messages, television programming, trauma, trauma based mind control, truth movement | 5 Comments
Why Is Justice Blind?
If you were completely foreign to the meme, “justice is blind“, how would you view that statement or its associated archetype? Would you not find the idea of justice that cannot see as strange?
While I have covered this particular meme in other documents about Archetypal Transference, I wanted to address it specifically in a document that is shorter & therefore easier to read.
The phrase “justice is blind“, is said to mean that justice is impartial, or that it is not biased, but I strongly disagree. The latter phrase is only two more syllables than the former. Is it really that much harder to say “justice is impartial”? How about “justice is fair“? Wouldn’t that last phrase be more accurate if one was trying to imply hat justice was “impartial”?
I believe the phrase “justice is blind” is a type of spell. It has become a sort of self-replicating meme, repeated by people who believe it means something other than what seems to be the actual intent behind such a phrase. The more people repeat it, the more the situation has become so. This is readily evident in the world today, if you’ve been paying attention.
If you are a victim of someone else’s misdeeds & find it difficult to get justice for your cause, you may understand this.
If you recognize the structure of western society, whereby corporations continue to rip of consumers by not only removing jobs from the country that spends the most money on their products, but by also ripping off their new employees in foreign countries by paying them less than a decent or living wage for their labor, & then rips off the consumer by skimping on their labor & raw materials, thus creating a substandard product, then you may recognize how justice has been anything but fair lately.
If you understand that the creation of the fed has helped to put the USA in ruin, then you may see the larger truth of what I am saying.
If you see how a relatively small portion of the population is wrongfully profiting from other people’s suffering, then you are seeing an effect of Archetypal Transference related to the whole “justice is blind” concept….
You may see the actual ramifications of getting people to repeat the phrase, “justice is blind”, over & over again over a period of many years, since around the 15th century (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lady_Justice).
If you do an internet search for the phrase, “justice is blind“, you may find more than one definition of it, many of which continue to point to the idea that it means that justice is impartial. This is a fallacy, designed to snow you, the public, into bringing about the condition of your own slavery, using what is referred to as “the law of attraction”.
The familiar icon, of the blindfolded woman holding the so-called scales of justice & a sword, is an archetype…. or is it an “archetypo“? Why would anyone want justice to be blind? Can she see how those scales are (in reality) way of balance? Apparently not.
To answer the question of the why, one must understand who profits & benefits the most from this forced manipulation of reality. Discover who controls most of the world’s wealth, & you will see who is behind this spell of a meme that began centuries ago, & has created a real dystopia for those who are the victims of this unfair & biased system of things.
I honestly feel that it is time to take the blindfold off of “Lady Justice” so that she may finally be able to do her job correctly. Justice should be fair, not blind.
2014©musicis2words All rights reserved
March 12, 2014 | Categories: Matirx, Occult, Symbolism, Uncategorized | Tags: archetypal transference, archetype, justice, justice is blind, lady justice, law of attraction, meme, metaphysical forensics, metaphysics, occult, self-fulfilling prophecy, spell | 3 Comments
This article is a revision of a previous article called, ”Mind Control Using Symbolism in Words and Numbers”. The original article is linked below.
Symbolism works on both visual & phonetic levels, on a subconscious level, to affect the psyche (a word that is derived from Greek & Latin words that refer to the spirit), which is why it works so well, and also why so many people don’t see it happening.
They cannot see the forest for the trees.
Or perhaps, those who cannot see it are still somewhat unconscious. Regardless of this fact, we are all born into these circumstances, through no fault of our own.
Some might even recognize language as a type of spell, no pun intended. So all of, visual symbolism, phonetic symbolism, combined with the over use of the archetypes forms the matrix we are living in.
Whatever the case may be, language is one of the first things an infant begins to learn in an effort to communicate. It is visual & phonetically perceived, once a person begins to learn to write. Texting has allowed for people to see more clearly the symbolism inherent in our language.
There are many methods of mind control that have been uncovered. As most of you know, there is symbolism and subliminals used in movies, music, and television; there are also high tech forms of mind control, using implants (nano or otherwise) and other technologies; there is mind control involving the use of trauma to mess with the human being’s psychology; there is a form of mind control that uses popular archetypes to remove freewill to a large degree; and then there is the manipulation of language. While the technology I have researched seems to be completely plausible, I am taking a look at language (specifically, the English Language, which is to a great degree, credited to Sir Francis Bacon) in this article, because it has been around much longer than the technology currently in use has been, and has a wider scope of impact.
Language, including words, names, phrases, and slang, seems to contain a disproportionate amount of negative symbolism (considering many root words), and it can even sometimes be confusing, albeit on a level that is hard to discern. This creates a subconscious and subtle base layer of confusion which then sets the stage for general mind control using other technologies, like movies, music, and television, for example.
Because symbolism bypasses the conscious mind and goes straight into the subconscious, it is a type of programming, especially when used in language, which is learned during the most impressionable years of a child’s life.
Here are some words & numbers that should be looked at symbolically, given the way symbolism affects the human psyche (Remember, these examples of symbolism in language can be visual and/or phonetic):
As I’ve noted in other documents, the word “psyche” is a Greek word denoting the spirit, which speaks volumes in itself. So psychology, then, is really the study of the spirit.
Sacred: the sacral chakra was originally described as red.
Century and Millennia: “cent” means 100, thus a century = 100 years. “Mill” refers to 1000,000, but a millennia = 1000 years (not a million years). Like the way certain months are not in line with their numbering, I contend that things like this can throw the psyche out of balance, in a subconscious way, thus making it easier for a person to be programmed by the above mentioned technologies.
Therapist = “the rapist”, which I had picked up many years ago, from a movie called, “Girl Interrupted” (Angelina Jolie’s character says it).
Ever noticed how many names have the word “war” in them? Warburg, Warner, Warren (as in the Warren Commission), are a few. By the way, “war” is not exactly fair, is it, yet there is a term out there known as “warfare”… does this word, because of the way it sounds symbolically, make it so that more people accept war happening in our world?
Which brings us to the expression, “all’s fair in love and war”, but it isn’t true. However, does the prevalence of that expression in our world, subconsciously make people accept things that occur in love and war?
Root Words: Consider how many words and names have root words like “ill”, “ow”, “mar”, “mal”, “war” or “ick” in them. Examples are Bill, Bow, Mark, Malcolm, warning, and Trick, respectively. What about “lack”, as in black & slack? I am sure you can think of other examples.
Left vs. Right:
Okay, so the word “right” usually refers to the following in the English language: a direction, right handed, correct, the conservative party… phonetically, there is also rite, as in a ritual; or write; or also right as in “human rights”, while….
The word “left” traditionally refers to: a direction, left as in the “liberal party”, and left as in “gone”. By the way, left-handedness is often called “south paw”… is there any symbolism there? If right means “correct”, does left symbolically mean “wrong”? Question: What happens if a person is naturally left-handed, but made to be right-handed? I ask this with the knowledge that a stroke in the left hemisphere of the brain has effects on the right side of the body & vice versa. Is this how the whole left-handers are right brained, and right-handers are left brained concept was developed? If someone who is left-handed is made to be right-handed, would it take them out of their right mind, symbolically, metaphorically, metaphysically, spiritually? Some illustrious scientist ought to do a study on the effects of forcing a left-hander to be right-handed, instead of experimenting with brain implants on children from compromised groups (like adoptees). Back in the day, left handedness was considered a sign of being a witch, and meant that a person was “evil”…
This brings me to the word “evil”… Is Eve ill?
While we’re on the biblical: what about “Cain & Abel”? Abel=able (as in “able-bodied”) Cain=cane (as in a tool to help a person walk)… could Cain have been disabled??? Dis Abel (dis-as in disrespect). Is this some kind of a joke? Did Cain really kill Abel? Judging by their names, it seems to me that Cain was disabled. I hope you don’t think I am blaspheming here, because I am simply searching for the truth.
How about Noah? No – ah??? As in “no relief“? Why was he one of God’s most favored in the bible? Because he got no relief? I mean… I wonder about this.
Graven = as past participle of “grave”, meaning “fraught with danger or harm”.
So are graven images merely images that are fraught with danger or harm? When I look at certain trump cards of the tarot, like the Tower, the Hanged Man, and Death, for example, this seems to be the case. It also seems to be the case in the use and near worship of the crucifix that so many people are fond of. Please see my document: http://musicis2words.wordpress.com/2012/09/11/symbolism-mind-control-and-metaphysical-sabotage-in-relation-to-archetypal-transference-and-the-second-commandment-of-the-decalogue
Or… what if graven images are those that have, over time, become engraven into the collective unconscious?
Justice = “just us” (from Jordan Maxwell), but how about “just-ice”?
Why is justice blind anyway? Some people say that this phrase relates the idea that justice is impartial. Well, why not just say “justice is impartial”? I need her to be sighted and to see the whole truth, because I feel like I am being judged for actions or behaviors taken out of context. Why can I not get justice for the horrible things that have been done to me ever since I was taken from my mother at birth, if the United States is supposed to be about “liberty and justice for all”? Alas, the ideal of “justice” has simply become yet another simulacrum in our modern world, only to be found in a clothing line these days.
Lettuce: “Let us” (let who?)
Black: “Be Lack”
Father: “Fat Her”
Mother: “M Other”
Government = govern= to control and ment=mind =”control of the mind” (from Michael Tsarion)
Horus = “Whore us” (us or U.S.?)
Hermes = “her-me’s”
Masons = “Ma-sons”
Masturbate = “master”, as in ruler, and “bait” as in what you use to go fishing.
Peace = piece=a gun or (piece of?) = peas
Nazi = “Not see” or “Not C”
Frequency = Freak when c or Free Quincy?
Alphabet = alpha (male) bet (wager)
DISC= “dis” “c” (as in disrespect)
Curfew = “cure few”
Culture= “cult”ure = as in a cult, or as in a petri dish
Metaphor = “meta” (above, beyond, before, or about); phor= “four” (4th trump of tarot is the Emperor card), so metaphor seems to favor the rulers of this world.
History = “his story” and Hebrews = “He brews” are easy examples of the misogynistic nature of our world.
Women are said to age less gracefully than men. Could the word “heritage” have something to do with that?
9 = Nine = “nein” = “no”(from Michael Tsarion)
11 = Eleven = El (a name of God, as in “elohim”) even (equal) eleven = 11th trump of various tarot decks (research them: in most, it means “justice”, or “strength”, while in one deck, it means “lust”). 11th sphere of cabala is supposed to represent “knowledge”, but it is often missing from the cabbalistic tree. So does 9/11 equate to “no justice”, “no strength, or “no knowledge”???? Did all those people die as blood sacrifices to empower some desire for no justice, strength, or knowledge??
12 = tw elve as in elves.
Most people recognize that Santa is an anagram of satan
Regarding numbers, would it not throw a young psyche off balance to learn the word “oct” (as in “octagon”) means “eight”, yet October is the 10th month? How about “sept” meaning seven, even though September is the 9th month? And don’t forget November and December. “Nov” means 9, and “Dec” refers to 10 (see: “Decade”). I have heard one person say that they had added on a few months in the names of Augustus and Julius Ceasar, but that is no reason to name the last four months out of sync with the way they are numbered. Also, a natural calendar would have 13 months of 28 days each, since the word “month” refers to “moon”.
Music = mu (12th letter of greek alphabet) & sic (“as intentionally so written”), and also “muse sick”. So this word, sic, could be symbolically felt as “12, as in intentionally so written”. As someone with a 12/12 birthdate, I cannot help but feel I have been programmed.
I have heard some people say “Obama nation”… it sounds like they’re saying “abomination” or “Oh bomb a nation”.
So when I hear people speak about freewill, I beg to differ if a portion of us are affected by these negative and/or confusing things in our language. It seems to me that more often than not, people are reacting to situations or circumstances set up long before we were ever born. This kind of destroys the concept of freewill for me. Especially when I consider how my adoptive mother named me with the initials, “C.A.T.”, and didn’t even like cats. Could that have had something to do with the way I was mistreated and neglected when I was growing up? Then, as an up and coming art student, I met a fellow student with the last name of “Skinner”, who was able to somehow steal many of ideas and ended up ruining my career and my life. The phrase, “How many ways can you skin the cat” comes to mind. Again, I ask, is this some kind of a joke?
Also, I have heard it said, many times, that animals are more sensitive than people. Could this have something to do with why I had such a hard time dealing with being bullied and neglected by my adoptive parents? They would often tell me I was too sensitive. Could my being “extra sensitive” have something to do with the self-fulfilling prophecy of my mother calling me stupid, and saying that I would never amount to anything?
For those of you who think I am being blasphemous, I ask you to remember that the Bible states that God loves the truth, which is all I am trying to find and talk about. I am sadly reminded of the song, “Blasphemous Rumors”, by Depeche Mode, where they sing, “I don’t want to start any blasphemous rumors, but I think that God has a sick sense of humor, and when I die, I expect to find him laughing”. Doesn’t the bible also say that the Truth shall set you free”? I sure hope so. I sure hope that God can see how all my life seems like it has been orchestrated and lived as a reaction to a negative programming (including much more than just the language), over which I had no control.
musicis2words © 2014 All rights reserved
March 12, 2014 | Categories: Matirx, Mind Control, Occult, Psychology, Symbolism, Uncategorized | Tags: collective subconscious, graven images, language as programming, metaphysical forensics, mind control, mu & sic, music is 2 words, occult, phonetic symbolism, psyche, spell, spirit, Subliminals, symbolism, The Matrix | 1 Comment